I see you consulted your lawyer to counter my argument about the borrow : What does it change ? Nothing. I repeat a new time my purpose is not to get my money back but to destroy definitly an official speech which is obviously an insult for any person acting in good faith.
Did i say i would get a favorable court decision in case of proceeding about that specific point ? No. Coz in that hypothesis i would have talk about a abuse of trust, but i don't need any laywer to know i wouldn't have many expetations to win. Without excluding abuse of trust (girl's charge) nor swindle (site's charge), I claim than everything i said proves rather a conspiration to defraud (whole chain's charge).
Telling the complete story would need too much place here but i persist and sign by adding i would testify the studio "boss" himself ordered to the camgirl the first WU transfer she asked to me, took half it's amount (like half of the others), and also told her what hotel where arranging our meeting. As i also would tesitfy he was not so far us when we met. What they didn't anticipate have been i found her out on FB after two years of research among the Romanian owner of the hotel where our meeting was arranged, a hotel itselsf wellknow for it's escort service what i didn't know at that period. She replied with a fake, denying she was the girl i was looking for, pretending to work in a bank (...) As that FB fake was occasionnaly used in intimidaion purpose on the cam/escort girl own confession, she dared to write to some of my acquitances and friends.
Another complementary evidence is the Chathostess's support (reminder: based in US) didn't legally motive it's unique "reply", despite of my numerous request and emails. No such thing would have had happen in a normal business, no support tickets nor email would have been ignored, someone would rather have had taken the initiative to solve the problem by entering in contact with me.
I have to be more precise : i have been a client of the camgirl on different sites like Topcams and Clubxlive on one hand (using Elora ressources SA features as chathosts and billing systems, base in Switzerland) and others "asian typed" sites regulary changing their domain name (Chathostess for the moment) powered by the Dutch Atlantic Ltd based in Holland, using Epoch as billing system, but according to the Camgirl also camconomy site (then Elora ressources SA, Switzerland). Most of links on internet confirm connections between the two companies given the possibily Camconomy IP's are located in Holland, not in Switzerland. Some common adresses appear notably the Dutch one.
As a matter, i want absolutely underline another suspect "discover" (i know, incorrect). I've alsso been her client on Webcamblub, a site sensed to be based in Cyprus, also using Epoch as billing system. But if you go deeper in your investigations you find out a Cambilling e.mail in their legal notices.
Definitly, everything proves what i assume : the girl lied, she did it inside the site(s) boundaries during her shifts under admins surveillance, everything is (illegally) recorded but i got insults instead of a relevant reply when i ask some records... without counting, a new time, i was not sensed to find out the girl in the real life coz everything is made for a general "anonymity", until sites owners or managers one. I can't help myself to specify she's a brunette on videochat sites but blonde in the real life (a confession she made to me probably by mistake) on one hand, she progressively had plastic surgery like that industry makes easy (please don't deny, i know it).
New summerize : the delivred thing is a simulated friendship instead of naked shows, rules are not applied coz there are personnal relations between clients and girls under admins surveillance nor girls firing in case of broken rules, intent to scam is pleadable considering the obvious anticipation and obstruction of justice, stakeholders have means of their crime (...) Each condition is required to talk about a conspiracy to defraud with one exception : all proofs.
Would it be surprising ? No. Because it would mean i know the studio... Because i must apparently insist, yes, she worked in a studio. No matter if i wouldn't be in position to prove the girl borrowed the money, do notice i probably could if police raid would be done in the studio (always the same irrefutable argument), again, everything demonstrates the initial purpose to scam with impunity. This is not about personnal ethic, that business is scam oriented by it's organisation and functionning.
Another thing. You point my shitty attitude while I could quote your own words each time you avoided the topic or created diversions. I won't make you the offense to say you're my executionner, but I have no good reason to trust your words when you claim you're not. I moreover feel obliged to dispute the idea poeple lost their house by naïvity, they lost it coz they were scammed ! And if noone did anything for them it's not coz it's impossible, but coz noone made the necessary. Naïvity is not a crime, but a potential manifestation of a vulnerability, what constitues an aggravating factor in case of crime, what makes heavier the sanctions.
Let's talk a minute about my mother coz it seems you worry about her : she's dead. I didn't help coz my scammer made me believe her own mother was ill, a reason why i helped her to pay medicines. If i had been naive, my severe alcholism was indubitably a determinating factor of vulnerability. She finally wanted to me i trust her mother died by chance precisely when i came in Romania, what would explained she can't spend time with me, nor can't give back the money to pay funerals (...).
Result ? On my side, first the camgirl litterally stole to me my last months with my agonising mother, she even stole my mourning... and as her unique heir at law, i had to pay my mother debts one time she left that world given i didn't help her at the properly moment, I didn't loose my house but agricultural lands in my family since three generations. I also lost my job coz that story actually made going insane !!!
On the camgirl side ? It leads to me to the relavancy of an Irish accountant about i didn't give informations enough given telling the complete story would again take too much place. But or he's actually one of her client as an escort as he pretended by contacting me on FB, then he actually has been ripped off in a similar way than mine, and i can trust him saying she joined him in Dublin when i was at Bucharest. Or he's one of complices playing with my mental health and she hold a management position in the videochat field today. In that second hypothesis, which could justify she told me working in a bank, she could perfectly work at Manwin or at Elora ressources SA. I know she has connections with the Romanian diaspora in Canada where is implanted Manwin, as i know that suspect business is also implanted in Ireland, a famous EU tax and heaven. As for Elora ressources AS of which noone can say if they are based in Switzerland (where she works as an escort) or in Holland, nothing forbid to imagine they store money both in Switzerland and Ireland ! There is a third hypothesis, namely she is simply a studio owner for some years, camming occasionally as offering her services occosionaly.
Hope you see better the link between my allusion and the topic here now. It is about financial mecanisms involving banks units in the whole EU area, about by order of severity regarding the law tax evasion if not money laundering. All of this on the backdrop of multiplied fake accounts on social media, then a psychological violence founded on a mix of attempts to desorientation and intimidation.
You ask me if my ego could have been the reason why i've been scammed. Let me say i won't mind my manner like this as commanded me UL, nor hold my horses as he said. I never met any comparable "big ego" in my life before that chat/escort girl, nor "biggest ego" as one of your colleagues on Topix, from Studio Silver. As a fashion model, porn star, and escort (also in charge of bank's public relations ?), needless to specify she's obsessed by her own image and worries more about her women's clothing than about poverty in her country. As a studio owner or manager, even pretexting to prevent scam with his client's culpabilizing speech, he worries more about avoiding criminal sanctions than about ethics. I would say i can perfctly imagine that last studio is simply hers. What lead a new time to the discontinuing of the thred "Romanian camgirls" on Topix, where are still recorded - but unfortunatly inaccessible to public eyes - my long struggle with several personas whom sometimes wrote things suggesting "they" were knowing more about my affair than a random visitor can percieve. An affair started with a girl having told me she began camming to pay her sister's kidney transplantation, then to help this same sister to escape from rappers, then to save her mother from a heart attack, then to help herself to pay a lever surgery and i'm sparing you her long littany of lies.
Her mistake have been to believe she could play with me in theses emotional registers having been raped myself, severly ill myself, and ofc having seen my two parents dying of lethal diseases. Her main mistake have been to forget if i've been what you call naïve, i am first of all an "old school person" : i believe in corevalues like as much mutual help as respect of (wo)man words when it's given. In this sense, i have something to do with ruffians. In a word, she overshadowed i was not the type of clients she get used to meet as an escort, who spend without counting, but on the contrary someone who know better than her what are poor living conditions and choices to walk on the bad or on the wrong way.
But allow me to repeat a new time that's not my story, that's your business one. Maybe my international "business girl" acting in Romania, Ireland and Switzerland is not the reflexion of each model but for sure she's the reflexion of the career oportunities offered in that field. As the bullying/stalking game resulting of a such scam if the client refuse to be treated like the guilt as poeple like you would like.
What i want is to denounce lies and bad faith reigning in that pretended 100 % legal business each time i'm exposed to it. What i want is to know which studios are under investigation coz the probability one of them is my target is extremely high. I certainly don't want to read "only poeple in the field know" while that fact is at the heart of my advocacy legitimation.
Then even if you're that forum's expert for the Eu area, what i still find strange given you're not a VIP, as well as if you expect to me i believe you're an ethical person, please change your tone with me. Or accept i react aggressively like if each videochat stakeholder would be to throw in the same pot. If "poeple in the field" would actually apply ethical rules as they argue, they would have implemented regulation and transparency rules for a long time, in each country they are providing their services, like every genuine business. Because a new time, i must dispute your argue "only customers can make prevention for themselves". The truth is that "grey zone" is the videochat bussiness best "success leverage" today again, it's guarantee of impunity, as your own "combination of success" master card.
Be sure I don't care about girls considering guys desserve to be fooled ! I don't need anybody involved in that industry to feel sorry for me. My experience with them lead to the conclusion they are dangerous psychopaths blinded by their their cupidity, having completely lost any connection with real life (on the contrary with what they argue with their mad hell of nerve), being ready to do everything for protecting their dirty money. If my means look as shitty as my attitude, don't loose in sight i just adapt my behaviour to my opponents.
Right now, If you still wonder what i do here, you can immediatly remove "making friends with poeple in that field" from your list.
PS : That said, yes, i read in a hurry : you wrote prostitution is illegal. I was wrong.